Academic Games Propaganda Section F Practice Test 2026 - Free Propaganda Practice Questions and Tips

Question: 1 / 400

Which of the following best describes a No Technique argument?

A question that leads to assumptions

A statement with no logical progression

A No Technique argument is characterized by a lack of logical structure or coherence, which is precisely what a statement with no logical progression entails. Such arguments fail to establish a clear connection between premises and conclusions, rendering them ineffective in persuading an audience. This approach often results in vague claims or unsupported assertions that do not hold up under scrutiny.

In contrast, questions that lead to assumptions, attacks on an opponent's record, or questions that assume guilt without proof may involve manipulative tactics or appeal to emotions, but they still possess a form of structure or intent, even if their logic is flawed. Therefore, identifying a No Technique argument is about recognizing statements that lack even the semblance of logical flow.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

An attack on an opponent's record

A question that assumes guilt without proof

Next Question

Report this question

Download Academic Games Propaganda Section F Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy